Hello Sergey,
i would like to ask whether there is any overhead in RV when adding or rendering unicode text.
Is there any functionallity that is not supported in Win9x when using unicode methods? (AddNLW...).
Is there any reason NOT to use only the unicode methods to add text and build a document?
I ask these questions because i need to render both ansii and unicode text and it would be much easier if i handled everything as unicode internally. I just want to be sure that there is no overhead and there will be no problem in older versions of windows.
Thanks,
Costas
Unicode vs Ansii documents
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17557
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:28 am
- Contact:
Only 2 features are not supported with Unicode on Win9x systems:
- bidirected text (right to left Hebrew or Arabic)
- all-caps option
Overhead? Only larger file sizes (and memory usage - may be significant only for HUGE documents)
If your application uses Unicode, I recommend to build completely Unicode documents.
- bidirected text (right to left Hebrew or Arabic)
- all-caps option
Overhead? Only larger file sizes (and memory usage - may be significant only for HUGE documents)
If your application uses Unicode, I recommend to build completely Unicode documents.